OH, please go to sleep! PLEASE!

               

Having trouble getting that little one to go to sleep, stay in bed…or maybe just not get in yours at night?

Here is the reality: aside from a quick swig of a tonic of some sort, there is really no way to force your kid (or anyone, really) to go to sleep.  It’s even worse than the old horse to water example.  MUCH more frustrating, and I’m not sure the last time a thirsty horse interfered with “mommy and daddy time.”  This can be a tough thing, so let’s look at one of the most common sources I have found in my work and how to fix it.

How it happens

The parent asks the child to go to bed and he doesn’t want to go.  Maybe the parent forces it a little at this point or allows the kid a bit more time with Thomas and Friends.  This usually can go on for a while (if you have read earlier posts you will know the child learns to extend his Thomas time by whining and complaining).

Let’s say you get him in the room and maybe in bed, but he screams, cries or comes to get you.  This can also go on and, for those with the problem, usually results in laying in bed, caressing them to sleep or allowing them to sleep in “mommy and daddy’s room.”  This problem generally doesn’t fix itself.

Why it happens

What usually happens is the child needs/wants the parent and gains access to the parent (or what the parent does – reading cool books, giving sweet backrubs or playing Princess Pony “just one more time”) by crying, screaming, running out, etc.  So if we were to look at this very simply:

Bed alone => Crying = mommy attention and backrub

Mommy leaves => scream = mommy returns…

Change the pattern:

Play the game, just play it better than them.  Take her to her room and read the book with her.  Tell her you want to read another book to her or give her a backrub, but she needs to stay in her bed until you come back in 5 minutes: “when I come back in 5 minutes, you need to be in your bed and under the covers and quiet, then we can read another part of the book/give backrubs, etc.”

Wait by the door, but quietly.  I don’t want her to know you are there.  You can set a timer if you want and either leave it in the room or take it with you.  Go in before the 5 minute mark only if she is quiet and tell her she is doing a good job (if she is) and tell her how many more minutes you have left.  If she is up and about, tell her she needs to be in bed when the timer goes off to read (if that is what she wants).

Repeat, repeat, repeat, extending the time you are out of the room slowly but surely.  You see what we are doing here?  She is getting the same (possibly more at this point) attention / book reading / backrubs as she was before BUT is getting it for being in bed rather than out; for being quiet, not for screaming.  Guess what?  Quiet leads to sleep better than screaming does.

Overly simple? 

Yep.  Difficult to begin? Yep.  But here is the good news: it will get better if you do it this way; it will only get worse if you keep doing it the way you are doing it.

REMINDER: Make sure your child is getting more of you for being quiet and in bed than she is getting for being loud out of bed.

“Did you hit your sister?” How we teach lying and how to fix it.

             

Remember the first time your kid lied to you?  GASP!  It happens one day, then you realize your kid just stepped into the next dimension.  How does it happen?  I’ll tell you. 

There are only so many times you will ask your child if they did something bad, then punish him, before he starts to figure it out: “if I tell her I pushed him, I will get a spanking,” “if I said I ate a cookie without permission, I’m not going to see those tasty Chips-a-hoy for a while.”   Kids learn to lie to escape the consequences of the actions.  So, I ask you,

are we punishing the act or the admission of the act?  HMMM. 

Here is the other part:  we often ask them if they did something when we don’t actually know what happened.  Sweet situation for the kid to be in… “did you do what I think you did?” What we are really doing is setting up wonderful opportunities for our children to lie to us and experience the benefits of lying.  Yikes.

How do we fix it?

How about focusing on telling the truth in the situations when telling a lie would be beneficial (to the kid)?  You can’t really get to the meat of it unless you are focusing on times when a) it matters, which means there is actually a benefit for lying and b) when you know the answer.

So, first be careful when you get into a situation when you think something happened, but you did not see it or are not sure what happened.   Second, realize there has to be an effective motivation for telling the truth.  It is best if the motivation for telling the truth is the same as it is for lying (escape of the consequence), instead of, say, an M&M for each time she tells the truth (there are some “textbook” explanations for this, so trust me).   Therefore, the effect of telling the truth is a reduction of the consequence of the action.  Don’t get rid of it altogether, but teach them there is a benefit to the truth. 

Remind them before:

“O.K., remember this is your opportunity to tell the truth and if you tell the truth things will not be as bad. Now, tell me what happened.” (I like “tell me what happened” rather than “did you hit her”).

“I punched her in her belly”

“I know, I saw you get angry and you told her to go away, which was fine, then you hit her.  You need to sit out of the game, but since you told me the truth, you can go back in after 5 minutes instead of 10.  O.K.?  Glad you told me the truth?  Good deal.  Take a seat.”  

This should be quick.  If the lie is told, proceed with whatever you were going to do, then have a brief talk afterward.  Don’t get into a “you lied to me!  I saw you do it!  rant.”  Again, we are focusing on rewarding truth telling rather than punishing lying.

I want to emphasize this works best if there is a consistent consequence for certain actions, so the kid has experience that one consequence is actually less severe than the other because he told the truth.  If you say, “it will be less,” but you make up your consequences on the fly (inconsistent), it might not be as powerful.

Mealtime “negotiations” and how to get rid of them

                     

It starts with a kid with a well prepared meal: 

KID: “I don’t want anymore!”  

PARENT: “You need to finish your dinner”

KID: “But I don’t want it anymore!  I’m not hungry!”

PARENT: “You need to eat, especially those green beans you haven’t touched yet.  EAT”

KID: (starting down at the plate with lip pooched out and hands holding his head)

TIME ELAPSES MAYBE WITH A LITTLE MORE BACK AND FORTH

PARENT: “You need to eat 2 of these, 3 of these and 1 more bite of that” (separating food on the plate into portions smaller than what was originally served) then you can have a cookie I bought for you today.”

Here is the problem: 

Frequent complaining about not eating and the daily negotiation of what to eat, how much to eat and “when will I be “finished?”  It leads to frequent arguments, frustration and not-fun family meals.  

Truly, the the source of the problem is we often don’t really think about what “finished” means until the kid starts to complain about how much she wants to eat.  We never think about how much we would be happy with if the kid did eat “enough.”  We are usually OK if he eats most of his dinner or she tries a few of the brussel sprouts, but rarely is it the case (especially with families who suffer from this problem) that the kid is in the “clean plate club.”  Actually, the idea of the “clean plate club” is increasingly difficult if we are always “supersizing” our own home meals and just hoping the kid eats a bunch at which time we will decide when they are “finished” or have had “enough” to earn that cookie.   

What to do: 

As you prepare your child’s meal, think then about what you want them to eat, how much of what items need to be eaten.  Remember, this is not what you necessarily want them to eat in terms of quantity, but what they need.  It is usually the amount of food you end up offering after the argument.  When you say, “2 of these, 1 of those, and 2 spoonfuls,”  that portion.  Be honest with yourself.  Put these things and only these things on the plate. 

Here is my reasoning: 

I want to avoid the confrontation altogether and take away the negotiation.  You do that by defining what “enough” is right up front: it is what you put on your plate (based on what was said above).  This might look like the portions you would see on a French restaurant, instead of the #6 at McDonalds, but it sets a very clear definition of what “finished” will be.  At this point, you can have the preferred dessert or after dinner activity based on your child “finishing” because you have defined it very nicely for them.  There is no argument about it…it is what it is.  One less argument, one less opportunity for them to learn their arguing and refusal works.  If they finish, they finish.  If they don’t, they don’t.  If they want more, they can have more.

Now, there are people out there that think teaching our kids to eat until the plate is “clean” is bad…the argument is that it leads to obesity.  Different topic altogether.  My point is that the “clean plate” is a very easy, very noticeable and measurable way to signify the completion of the meal for the kid.  We make it so by being very deliberate in what we put on the plate in the first place.  You might find your kids actually eat better when they learn they can’t negotiate their meals.  

bon appetit

Exhausted Angry vs. Exhausted Happy

               

Something I hear from parents a lot is “this is exhausting.”  When I hear that, I smile my best smile, tell them, “I know” and then tell them that is NOT going to change.  The right answer, the strategies that work, are also exhausting.  It takes energy.  It takes time.  Two things you say you don’t have, but here is the reality: you are going to spend BOTH either way you look at it.  Why not do it in a way that you end up exhausted and HAPPY rather than exhausted and ANGRY.

Is this behavior thing easy?  NO.  Does it take work?  ABSOLUTELY.  Are there short cuts?  NOT REALLY (by the way, you could spend months and Donald Trump’s trust fund on short cut remedies if you want…I’ll see you when you get back).

Now, here is the good news/bad news:  

GOOD NEWS: if you spend the energy and time in the right direction, things will get better and you will have to spend less and less time and energy on maintaining appropriate behavior.  

BAD NEWS: if you don’t do this, and you continue to spend your energy being frustrated, staying in the abyss of punishing bad behavior after bad behavior, 1) the behavior will not likely improve and 2) you will continue to be more and more exhausted.  It will not magically get better as a result of “maturity,” “going to school” or “dad coming home.” Sorry.

Take home lessons:

  • Get up from the couch to prevent kids from fighting before they fight (you know when it is going to happen, but crossing your fingers and turning up the volume on the TV has not worked yet).  AGAIN…You are going to get up in a few minutes anyway when your daughter’s head hits the wall, right?  
  • A few minutes of prevention can make the difference between exhausted/happy and exhausted/angry.
  • Stay active.  Down time is an enemy.  The older your child, the less you have to attend to this, but then again, the trouble a 10 year old can get into in 15 minutes can be pretty wretched too. 
  • Simply recognize the effort is going to be there one way or the other.  Spending it in the right direction makes all the difference in the world, for your child AND YOU!

THIS IS NOT WORKING!!!!

                               

Behavior change can be difficult.  It takes time.  There is no “golden pill.”  When I suggest certain parenting changes or a new strategy, sometimes it can be immediately effective because it puts in place certain prevention strategies and takes advantage of very strong desires of the child.  A lot of times it is not that easy or quick to take hold. 

WHY? 

Because you are not only teaching your child, “hey, this new way is better,” you are trying to teach your child, “hey, the old way isn’t going to work anymore.”  Also, the new way is probably more effortful than the old way, even though the benefits are greater.  For example, cleaning your room is more effortful than not cleaning your room, even though we get to have ice cream after you are done cleaning.   Ever thought about that?

Experiences rather than time

Another thing to think about is experience.  We all must have experiences to learn from, not just “the rules.” I will talk about learning “opportunities” soon, but it is important to know there are very few times we learn something after a single experience.  Most involve terrible pain or discomfort (or a bottle with a worm at the bottom).  All other learning comes from multiple experiences of what happens when we do one thing versus the other.  This takes time.  You can reduce the chronological time it takes to learn something by increasing the number of experiences the child has with a particular behavior or “opportunity” such as following directions or cleaning his room.  

If you decide, after reviewing everything, and maybe after reading something I’ve suggested, to make a change in your parenting style or even in your response to your child when she throws a tantrum, make a concerted effort to stick with it for a while and pay attention to what happens.  Many times, it gets tough because the old behavior isn’t working anymore.  Understand the behavior you are trying to replace has a history you are trying to undo, make informed decisions and give it some time. 

Remember, what you were doing wasn’t working either or you would not have changed in the first place.

“It’s up to you!” – Put the power on your side

                                

This is one of my favorite lessons for parents. The lesson is: if you set things up correctly, think ahead as much as possible, and have good control over powerful motivators, you can use four of the most powerful words in the parenting dictionary: “Its up to you.”

Lets think about a pretty common scenario: chores. Kids hate chores and do not look forward to doing them.

Neither do you, but you do them because there are certain things that motivate you: your husband wants it done, you have friends coming over, your wife considers socks on the floor as “inconsiderate,” etc.

NEWSFLASH: Your kids are not motivated by these things. They don’t (and likely won’t) do it “because you should.” You hold the motivation and it does not have to be the avoidance of pain! If you have control over preferred things (we have talked about this before and will continue to, by the way) you lead the way.

Lets say, for example, little Timmy likes to come home and search YouTube skating videos. Cool.

PARENT: “Make sure you get your room cleaned then you can check out the new videos.”

TIMMY: “Im not doing it…nope…I cleaned it last week. Its fine!”

PARENT: (knowing the computer is password protected) says, “OK, its up to you” while doing the shoulder shrug thing that generally indicates “oh well.”

The point you communicate when you say “its up to you:” there are controls and consequences in place that will either make the appropriate behavior more likely in the future or make the inappropriate behaviors less fun and less likely. You got it! No emotion, no screaming, no points for argument.

A couple important things about this seemingly (and rightfully so) easy strategy:

1) You have to be O.K. with the room not being cleaned RIGHT NOW and even today. We are working on the power of the computer to motivate here. Remember: long term. This is not about what makes him do it right now, but more about what makes them more likely to do it over time with as little carnage as possible.

2) Deprivation matters, but so does satiation. Having not played Wii in 5 days for some kids is like not eating for 10. Motivation. However, if you are not dealing with something powerful on a daily basis, you might get some satiation. Grouping things such as electronics (Wii, TV, Computer) helps.

Pinky swears and cherries on top…

               

There is a simple behavior principle taught in textbooks and classrooms called the “Premack principle.” In textbook terms it states fairly simply: high frequency behavior can be used as reinforcers for low frequency behavior.  Alright, enough of the textbooks, here is the lesson:

 In terms of getting the best out of your kids, the behaviors that are least likely to occur (chores, teeth brushing, homework, getting dressed for school) need to occur BEFORE behaviors that are more likely to occur (video games, watching TV, playing outside, etc).  It is about using those preferred activities as natural reinforcers for the unpreferred or less desirable activities.  In other words, the “pinky swears” and “cherries on top” promises of “I will do my homework when I’m done watching SpongeBob” can be bad news.  The Premack principle would suggest you would do better if “as soon as you finish your homework, you can watch SpongeBob” (another reason I love DVR, by the way).  We have talked about this before in terms of controlling access to SpongeBob so you can say that and get the best out of Dr. Premack’s finding.

 My suggestions to families is to set up their schedules and their routines to take advantage of these things.  Set up the afternoons so the preferred things can come after all the things that need to be done.  Homework, dinner, chores somewhere in there, THEN preferred stuff.  Get everything you can get done before the preferred things.   It doesn’t matter that the shower is done and teeth are brushed right before going to bed, …just as long as they don’t eat anything or roll in the mud as a part of the preferred activities.  This frees you incredibly.

 Oh, and one last point.  What happens when SpongeBob is over?  You are in the same place with the homework is where you started.  Now what?  You have nothing but a sore pinky and rotten cherries.